DebiChem Project
Summary
Bugs of task periodic-abinitio
Total bugs: 18
Open bugs: 15
Fixed bugs: 3
Links to other tasks Legend
SeverityDependentSuggested
critical 0 0
grave 0 0
serious 3 0
important 4 0
normal 3 0
minor 3 0
wishlist 2 0

Summary bugs page of task Periodic ab initio calculations

Immediately looking into bugs of the dependencies of this task is advised (186)*

Open bugs in dependent packages

3 serious, 4 important, 3 normal, 3 minor, 2 wishlist
988798 abinit-doc: broken symlink: /usr/share/doc/abinit/html/index.md -> guide/new_user.md
1015347 abinit: ftbfs with LTO (link time optimization) enabled trixie, sid
1073088 abinit: build-depends on markdown
1076027 abinit: FTBFS with mpich as default MPI implementation on 32 bit architectures: Error: Type mismatch in argument ‘block_displ’ at (1); passed INTEGER(8) to INTEGER(4) ftbfs
948909 cp2k: test failure on armhf and i386 with libint2
1021057 cp2k autopkgtest times outs on armel
1060949 cp2k: FTBFS: message_passing.F:1035:(.text+0x57edd): undefined reference to `mpi_comm_set_errhandler_' ftbfs, sid, trixie
772361 quantum-espresso-data: bashism in /bin/sh script
818432 espresso: FTBFS on armel: hangs during the build ftbfs
861820 quantum-espresso-data: documentation is missing
1044341 espresso: Fails to build source after successful build ftbfs, sid, trixie
1069447 gpaw: FTBFS on armhf: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test --test-pytest -i python{version} -p "3.12 3.11" --test-pytest "--test-args=-v -m ci" returned exit code 13 trixie, sid, ftbfs, unreproducible, moreinfo
935993 nwchem: NWChem compiled with long int lapack/blas interface?
935994 nwchem: NWChem compiled with long int lapack/blas interface?
1074524 wannier90: autopkgtest failure with Python 3.12

Open bugs in suggested packages

Done bugs

1078912 gpaw: annotate test dependencies <!nocheck> patch
957639 openmx: ftbfs with GCC-10 sid, bookworm, ftbfs, trixie, bullseye
1079187 openmx: Build fixes patch
*To estimate the overall status of the packages in the dependencies of a metapackage a weighted severity is calculated. Done bugs are ignored and bugs in dependent and recommended packages are weighted by factor three compared to suggested packages. Release critical bugs have a much larger weight than important, while the contribution of normal bugs is even smaller and minor bugs have a very small weight. Wishlist bugs are ignored in this calculation. The resulting sum is compared to some boundaries to find a verbal form. The actual numbers need some adjustment to make real sense - this evaluation method is in testing phase.
The severities of bugs are weighted as follows:
critical10
grave10
serious10
important5
normal3
minor1
wishlist0
Last update: Sat, 14 Sep 2024 04:51:41 -0000