Summary

Bugs of task radioastronomy

Total bugs: 7

Open bugs: 3

Fixed bugs: 4

Links to other tasks

Tasks overview

Ascl 82 (660)

Astroconda 25 (168)

Catalogs 1 (3)

Data reduction 8 (66)

Development 78 (690)

Education 22 (156)

Fedora 1299 (8685)

Frameworks 12 (84)

Gdl 5 (54)

Iraf 4 (36)

Java 5 (18)

Publication 276 (2016)

Pulsar analysis 0 (0)

Python 0 (0)

Python3 82 (699)

Radio astronomy 3 (45)

Scisoft 136 (996)

Simulation 5 (42)

Spaceship navigation 1 (15)

Tcl/tk 19 (141)

Telescope control 10 (87)

Tools 8 (63)

Viewers 29 (240)

Virtual observatory 8 (84)

Legend

Severity	Dependent	Suggested
critical	0	0
grave	0	0
serious	0	0
important	3	0
normal	0	0
minor	0	0
wishlist	0	0

Summary bugs page of task Radio astronomy

Consider looking into bugs of this task^*

Open bugs in dependent packages

3 important

aoflagger (1) Homepage: https://aoflagger.readthedocs.io Vcs Debian Astro Team
1115249	aoflagger: FTBFS with glibc 2.42 due to conflict with the newly added pown function	forky, ftbfs, sid
casacore (1) Homepage: https://casacore.github.io/casacore Vcs Debian Astro Team
838427	casacore: FTBFS on hppa and mips64el: tFFTServer2 fails
pybdsf (1) Homepage: https://pybdsf.readthedocs.io/ Vcs Debian Astro Maintainers
1110653	pybdsf ftbfs with boost 1.88	forky, sid

Open bugs in suggested packages

Done bugs

openvlbi (1) Homepage: https://iliaplatone.github.io/OpenVLBI/ Vcs Debian Astronomy Team
1113367	openvlbi: FTBFS with CMake 4	forky, ftbfs, sid
purify (1) Homepage: https://astro-informatics.github.io/purify/ Vcs Debian Astro Team
1113430	purify: FTBFS with CMake 4	forky, ftbfs, sid
spectral-cube (1) Homepage: https://spectral-cube.readthedocs.org Vcs Debian Astronomy Team
1114721	spectral-cube: FTBFS with NumPy 2.3	forky, ftbfs, sid
wsclean (1) Homepage: https://gitlab.com/aroffringa/wsclean/ Vcs Debian Astro Team
1113633	wsclean: FTBFS with CMake 4	forky, ftbfs, sid

^*To estimate the overall status of the packages in the dependencies of a metapackage a weighted severity is calculated. Done bugs are ignored and bugs in dependent and recommended packages are weighted by factor three compared to suggested packages. Release critical bugs have a much larger weight than important, while the contribution of normal bugs is even smaller and minor bugs have a very small weight. Wishlist bugs are ignored in this calculation. The resulting sum is compared to some boundaries to find a verbal form. The actual numbers need some adjustment to make real sense - this evaluation method is in testing phase.
The severities of bugs are weighted as follows:

critical	10
grave	10
serious	10
important	5
normal	3
minor	1
wishlist	0