PAN Blend Project
Summary
Bugs of task control-systems-dev
Total bugs: 20
Open bugs: 18
Fixed bugs: 2
Links to other tasks
Control-systems 18 (186)
Diffraction 21 (198)
Imaging 228 (1868)
Laue 0 (0)
Machine-learning 30 (332)
Modelling 8 (75)
Mx 86 (691)
Mx-dev 2 (15)
Powder 12 (123)
Spectroscopy 12 (135)
Tomography 43 (332)
Xas 9 (78)
Legend
SeverityDependentSuggested
critical 0 0
grave 0 0
serious 1 0
important 5 0
normal 8 0
minor 3 0
wishlist 1 0

Summary bugs page of task Control-systems-dev

Immediately looking into bugs of the dependencies of this task is advised (186)*

Open bugs in dependent packages

1 serious, 5 important, 8 normal, 3 minor, 1 wishlist
1039087 epic-base: embed yajl
1040159 epics-base: embedded yajl is vulnerable to CVE-2017-16516 and CVE-2022-24795 security, upstream
1042878 FTBFS: on all architectures fixed-upstream
1068708 Building with EPICS fails because the compiler cannot find `compilerSpecific.h`.
1072148 epics-base: please add support for loong64 patch
1079604 epics-base:FTBFS:build failure (not support riscv64) ftbfs, patch
1092006 epics-base: procedure to update debian/control
1092462 pkg-config files are broken in epics-dev package
1092604 epics-dev: EPICS development tools missing
1096585 epics-base: ftbfs with GCC-15 forky, sid
1102787 epics-base: add perl-xs-dev to Build-Depends
1108052 epics-base: FTBFS: Failed 12/152 subtests forky, ftbfs, help, sid, trixie
1031884 pytango FTBFS on big endian architectures fixed-upstream, ftbfs
1035245 sardana: please add autopkgtests (to add coverage for python3-numpy)
737956 can not install if a non system tango user exists
1048363 tango: Fails to build source after successful build forky, ftbfs, sid, trixie
739895 python-taurus-doc: ships with duplicates of Tango icons, and icons that could be shared
1047828 taurus: Fails to build source after successful build forky, ftbfs, sid, trixie

Open bugs in suggested packages

Done bugs

1096813 hkl: ftbfs with GCC-15 forky, sid
1062979 tango-db: the upgraded version of tango-db is not compatible with maria-db from bookworm moreinfo
*To estimate the overall status of the packages in the dependencies of a metapackage a weighted severity is calculated. Done bugs are ignored and bugs in dependent and recommended packages are weighted by factor three compared to suggested packages. Release critical bugs have a much larger weight than important, while the contribution of normal bugs is even smaller and minor bugs have a very small weight. Wishlist bugs are ignored in this calculation. The resulting sum is compared to some boundaries to find a verbal form. The actual numbers need some adjustment to make real sense - this evaluation method is in testing phase.
The severities of bugs are weighted as follows:
critical10
grave10
serious10
important5
normal3
minor1
wishlist0
Last update: Sat, 06 Sep 2025 02:28:07 -0000