Debian GIS Project
Summary
Bugs of task remotesensing
Total bugs: 6
Open bugs: 4
Fixed bugs: 2
Links to other tasks
Data 0 (0)
Development 73 (558)
Gps 94 (614)
Openstreetmap 31 (173)
Statistics 0 (0)
Map server 2 (14)
Workstation 50 (499)
Legend
SeverityDependentSuggested
critical 0 0
grave 0 0
serious 0 0
important 1 1
normal 1 0
minor 1 0
wishlist 0 0

Summary bugs page of task Remote sensing

Consider looking into bugs of this task*

Open bugs in dependent packages

1 important, 1 normal, 1 minor
1050779 coda: Drop unused libnetcdf-dev build dependency patch
1047423 pyerfa: Fails to build source after successful build ftbfs, sid, trixie
1131082 satpy: autopkgtest regression with NumPy 2.4

Open bugs in suggested packages

1 important
1123960 netcdf: CVE-2025-14932 CVE-2025-14933 CVE-2025-14934 CVE-2025-14935 CVE-2025-14936 security, upstream

Done bugs

1126249 satpy: FTBFS: FAILED satpy/tests/reader_tests/test_avhrr_l0_hrpt.py::TestHRPTGetCalibratedReflectances::test_calibrated_reflectances_values forky, ftbfs, sid
1129912 satpy: FTBFS: FAILED satpy/tests/modifier_tests/test_parallax.py::TestParallaxCorrectionModifier::test_modifier_interface_cloud_moves_to_observer[foroyar-True-15000] forky, ftbfs, sid
*To estimate the overall status of the packages in the dependencies of a metapackage a weighted severity is calculated. Done bugs are ignored and bugs in dependent and recommended packages are weighted by factor three compared to suggested packages. Release critical bugs have a much larger weight than important, while the contribution of normal bugs is even smaller and minor bugs have a very small weight. Wishlist bugs are ignored in this calculation. The resulting sum is compared to some boundaries to find a verbal form. The actual numbers need some adjustment to make real sense - this evaluation method is in testing phase.
The severities of bugs are weighted as follows:
critical10
grave10
serious10
important5
normal3
minor1
wishlist0
Last update: Tue, 07 Apr 2026 16:53:58 -0000