Summary

Bugs of task remotesensing

Total bugs: 10

Open bugs: 5

Fixed bugs: 5

Links to other tasks

Tasks overview

Data 0 (0)

Development 75 (597)

Gps 97 (649)

Openstreetmap 34 (218)

Remote sensing 5 (62)

Statistics 0 (0)

Map server 2 (14)

Workstation 48 (509)

Legend

Severity	Dependent	Suggested
critical	0	0
grave	0	0
serious	1	0
important	1	1
normal	1	0
minor	1	0
wishlist	0	0

Summary bugs page of task Remote sensing

Looking into bugs of this task is recommended^*

Open bugs in dependent packages

1 serious, 1 important, 1 normal, 1 minor

coda (2) Homepage: https://github.com/stcorp/coda Vcs Debian Science Maintainers
1050779	coda: Drop unused libnetcdf-dev build dependency	patch
1133807	libcoda-dev fails to coinstall
pyerfa (1) Homepage: https://github.com/liberfa/pyerfa Vcs Debian Astronomy Maintainers
1047423	pyerfa: Fails to build source after successful build	ftbfs, sid, trixie
pyresample (1) Homepage: https://github.com/pytroll/pyresample Vcs Debian GIS Project
1134248	pyresample: FTBFS with GDAL 3.13.0	ftbfs, upstream

Open bugs in suggested packages

1 important

netcdf (1) Homepage: http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/software/netcdf/ Vcs Debian GIS Project
1123960	netcdf: CVE-2025-14932 CVE-2025-14933 CVE-2025-14934 CVE-2025-14935 CVE-2025-14936	security, upstream

Done bugs

epr-api (1) Homepage: https://github.com/bcdev/epr-api Vcs Debian GIS Project
1134784	libepr-api-dev fails to coinstall
gdal (3) Homepage: http://www.gdal.org/ Vcs Debian GIS Project
1135997	gdal: CVE-2026-8084 CVE-2026-8086 CVE-2026-8087 CVE-2026-8088	security, upstream
1137061	gdal-bin: Can gdal-bin be compiled with support for (geo)parquet?
1137148	gdal: Please drop dependencies on virtual packages from mysql-defaults
stac-check (1) Homepage: https://github.com/stac-utils/stac-check Vcs Debian GIS Project
1135488	stac-check: FTBFS: E importlib.metadata.PackageNotFoundError: No package metadata was found for stac-validator	forky, ftbfs, sid

^*To estimate the overall status of the packages in the dependencies of a metapackage a weighted severity is calculated. Done bugs are ignored and bugs in dependent and recommended packages are weighted by factor three compared to suggested packages. Release critical bugs have a much larger weight than important, while the contribution of normal bugs is even smaller and minor bugs have a very small weight. Wishlist bugs are ignored in this calculation. The resulting sum is compared to some boundaries to find a verbal form. The actual numbers need some adjustment to make real sense - this evaluation method is in testing phase.
The severities of bugs are weighted as follows:

critical	10
grave	10
serious	10
important	5
normal	3
minor	1
wishlist	0