Summary

Bugs of task remotesensing

Total bugs: 9

Open bugs: 8

Fixed bugs: 1

Links to other tasks

Tasks overview

Data 0 (0)

Development 77 (669)

Gps 94 (626)

Openstreetmap 31 (179)

Remote sensing 8 (137)

Statistics 0 (0)

Map server 3 (29)

Workstation 51 (538)

Legend

Severity	Dependent	Suggested
critical	0	0
grave	0	0
serious	3	0
important	2	1
normal	1	0
minor	1	0
wishlist	0	0

Summary bugs page of task Remote sensing

Immediately looking into bugs of the dependencies of this task is advised (137)^*

Open bugs in dependent packages

3 serious, 2 important, 1 normal, 1 minor

coda (2) Homepage: https://github.com/stcorp/coda Vcs Debian Science Maintainers
1050779	coda: Drop unused libnetcdf-dev build dependency	patch
1133807	libcoda-dev fails to coinstall
epr-api (1) Homepage: https://github.com/bcdev/epr-api Vcs Debian GIS Project
1134784	libepr-api-dev fails to coinstall
erfa (1) Homepage: https://github.com/liberfa/erfa Vcs Debian Astronomy Maintainers
1133139	erfa: FTBFS on armhf: t_erfa_c validation failed!	forky, ftbfs, sid
pyerfa (1) Homepage: https://github.com/liberfa/pyerfa Vcs Debian Astronomy Maintainers
1047423	pyerfa: Fails to build source after successful build	ftbfs, sid, trixie
pyresample (1) Homepage: https://github.com/pytroll/pyresample Vcs Debian GIS Project
1134248	pyresample: FTBFS with GDAL 3.13.0	ftbfs, upstream
satpy (1) Homepage: https://github.com/pytroll/satpy Vcs Debian GIS Project
1131082	satpy: autopkgtest regression with NumPy 2.4

Open bugs in suggested packages

1 important

netcdf (1) Homepage: http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/software/netcdf/ Vcs Debian GIS Project
1123960	netcdf: CVE-2025-14932 CVE-2025-14933 CVE-2025-14934 CVE-2025-14935 CVE-2025-14936	security, upstream

Done bugs

pyogrio (1) Homepage: https://github.com/geopandas/pyogrio Vcs Debian GIS Project
1134132	pyogrio: FTBFS with GDAL 3.13.0	ftbfs, patch, upstream

^*To estimate the overall status of the packages in the dependencies of a metapackage a weighted severity is calculated. Done bugs are ignored and bugs in dependent and recommended packages are weighted by factor three compared to suggested packages. Release critical bugs have a much larger weight than important, while the contribution of normal bugs is even smaller and minor bugs have a very small weight. Wishlist bugs are ignored in this calculation. The resulting sum is compared to some boundaries to find a verbal form. The actual numbers need some adjustment to make real sense - this evaluation method is in testing phase.
The severities of bugs are weighted as follows:

critical	10
grave	10
serious	10
important	5
normal	3
minor	1
wishlist	0