Summary

Bugs of task remotesensing

Total bugs: 10

Open bugs: 4

Fixed bugs: 6

Links to other tasks

Tasks overview

Data 0 (0)

Development 105 (837)

Gps 108 (656)

Openstreetmap 54 (363)

Remote sensing 4 (53)

Statistics 0 (0)

Map server 4 (36)

Workstation 51 (431)

Legend

Severity	Dependent	Suggested
critical	0	0
grave	0	0
serious	1	0
important	0	1
normal	2	0
minor	0	0
wishlist	0	0

Summary bugs page of task Remote sensing

Looking into bugs of this task is recommended^*

Open bugs in dependent packages

1 serious, 2 normal

coda (2) Homepage: https://github.com/stcorp/coda Vcs Debian Science Maintainers
1050779	coda: Drop unused libnetcdf-dev build dependency	patch
1074886	coda: ftbfs with GCC-14	trixie, ftbfs, sid
satpy (1) Homepage: https://github.com/pytroll/satpy Vcs Debian GIS Project
1071752	satpy: arm64 fails netCDF4 tests with scipy 1.12

Open bugs in suggested packages

1 important

ncview (1) Homepage: https://cirrus.ucsd.edu/ncview/ Vcs Debian GIS Project
543162	[ncview] segfault when clicking on "Axes" button	confirmed, upstream

Done bugs

ncview (1) Homepage: https://cirrus.ucsd.edu/ncview/ Vcs Debian GIS Project
1075309	ncview: ftbfs with GCC-14	sid, trixie
pysolid (1) Homepage: https://github.com/insarlab/PySolid Vcs Debian GIS Project
1069217	pysolid ftbfs with Python 3.12	moreinfo, trixie, sid, patch
python-geotiepoints (1) Homepage: https://github.com/pytroll/python-geotiepoints Vcs Debian GIS Project
1075930	python-geotiepoints: fails tests with scipy 1.13
python-hdf4 (1) Homepage: https://github.com/fhs/pyhdf Vcs Debian GIS Project
1075417	python-hdf4: ftbfs with GCC-14	sid, trixie
satpy (1) Homepage: https://github.com/pytroll/satpy Vcs Debian GIS Project
1076922	satpy: FTBFS: failing tests	ftbfs
skyfield (1) Homepage: https://github.com/brandon-rhodes/python-skyfield Vcs Debian Astronomy Maintainers
1069861	skyfield: please remove the extraneous python3-mock dependency

^*To estimate the overall status of the packages in the dependencies of a metapackage a weighted severity is calculated. Done bugs are ignored and bugs in dependent and recommended packages are weighted by factor three compared to suggested packages. Release critical bugs have a much larger weight than important, while the contribution of normal bugs is even smaller and minor bugs have a very small weight. Wishlist bugs are ignored in this calculation. The resulting sum is compared to some boundaries to find a verbal form. The actual numbers need some adjustment to make real sense - this evaluation method is in testing phase.
The severities of bugs are weighted as follows:

critical	10
grave	10
serious	10
important	5
normal	3
minor	1
wishlist	0