Debian Astro Project
Summary
Bugs of task datareduction
Total bugs: 10
Open bugs: 8
Fixed bugs: 2
Links to other tasks
Ascl 92 (675)
Astroconda 31 (216)
Catalogs 1 (3)
Development 62 (501)
Education 22 (144)
Fedora 1261 (8874)
Frameworks 9 (24)
Gdl 5 (54)
Iraf 6 (42)
Java 4 (9)
Publication 285 (2076)
Python 0 (0)
Python3 140 (1278)
Scisoft 160 (1245)
Simulation 7 (18)
Tcl/tk 21 (135)
Tools 11 (81)
Viewers 23 (159)
Legend
SeverityDependentSuggested
critical 0 0
grave 0 0
serious 0 0
important 0 0
normal 3 0
minor 5 0
wishlist 0 0

Summary bugs page of task Data reduction

Consider looking into bugs of this task*

Open bugs in dependent packages

3 normal, 5 minor
1043901 astap: Fails to build source after successful build forky, ftbfs, sid
1044103 astrometry.net: Fails to build source after successful build ftbfs, sid, trixie
1085330 astrometry.net: Python SyntaxWarning
1105281 astrometry.net: FTBFS with make --shuffle=reverse: make[3]: *** No rule to make target '../catalogs/libcatalogs.a', needed by 'plot-constellations'. Stop. forky, ftbfs, sid, trixie
1043736 astroscrappy: Fails to build source after successful build ftbfs, sid, trixie
1084822 Montage homepage uses HTTP not HTTPS
983953 scamp: ftbfs with -march=x86-64-v3 pending
812504 swarp: breaks when coadding many overlapping files

Open bugs in suggested packages

Done bugs

1144991 astrometry.net: FTBFS with swig 4.5.0 forky, ftbfs, patch, sid
1108437 esorex: autopkgtest depends on removed package cpl-plugin-amber trixie-ignore
*To estimate the overall status of the packages in the dependencies of a metapackage a weighted severity is calculated. Done bugs are ignored and bugs in dependent and recommended packages are weighted by factor three compared to suggested packages. Release critical bugs have a much larger weight than important, while the contribution of normal bugs is even smaller and minor bugs have a very small weight. Wishlist bugs are ignored in this calculation. The resulting sum is compared to some boundaries to find a verbal form. The actual numbers need some adjustment to make real sense - this evaluation method is in testing phase.
The severities of bugs are weighted as follows:
critical10
grave10
serious10
important5
normal3
minor1
wishlist0
Last update: Thu, 10 Sep 2026 04:21:30 -0000