Summary

Bugs of task iraf

Total bugs: 7

Open bugs: 6

Fixed bugs: 1

Links to other tasks

Tasks overview

Ascl 96 (606)

Astroconda 30 (183)

Catalogs 1 (3)

Data reduction 12 (72)

Development 80 (720)

Education 21 (141)

Fedora 1319 (8799)

Frameworks 9 (24)

Gdl 4 (39)

Iraf 6 (42)

Java 7 (72)

Publication 283 (2019)

Pulsar analysis 0 (0)

Python 0 (0)

Python3 141 (1344)

Radio astronomy 4 (75)

Scisoft 160 (1188)

Simulation 6 (18)

Spaceship navigation 0 (0)

Tcl/tk 22 (150)

Telescope control 12 (114)

Tools 9 (66)

Viewers 24 (156)

Virtual observatory 4 (21)

Legend

Severity	Dependent	Suggested
critical	0	0
grave	0	0
serious	0	0
important	1	0
normal	2	0
minor	3	0
wishlist	0	0

Summary bugs page of task Iraf

Consider looking into bugs of this task^*

Open bugs in dependent packages

1 important, 2 normal, 3 minor

iraf (1) Homepage: https://iraf-community.github.io Vcs Debian Astro Team
1105412	iraf: FTBFS with make --shuffle=reverse: xwsne.c:1:10: fatal error: f2c.h: No such file or directory	forky, ftbfs, sid, trixie
iraf-rvsao (1) Homepage: http://tdc-www.harvard.edu/iraf/rvsao/ Vcs Debian Astro Team
1045926	iraf-rvsao: Fails to build source after successful build	ftbfs, sid, trixie
saods9 (2) Homepage: http://ds9.si.edu/ Vcs Debian Astronomy Maintainers
988992	saods9: WCS of non-sky FITS displays %1.8G, original ds9 is ok	upstream
1049271	saods9: Fails to build source after successful build	ftbfs, sid, trixie
wcstools (2) Homepage: http://tdc-www.harvard.edu/software/wcstools/ Vcs Debian Astro Team
1076547	iraf-wcstools: Potential vulnerability due to similarity with CVE-2021-33797 in MuJS project
1077881	wcstools-3.9.7 crlf change	patch, wontfix

Open bugs in suggested packages

Done bugs

pyraf (1) Homepage: https://iraf-community.github.io/pyraf.html Vcs Debian Astro Team
1129367	pyraf: failed autopkgtest with ipython 9

^*To estimate the overall status of the packages in the dependencies of a metapackage a weighted severity is calculated. Done bugs are ignored and bugs in dependent and recommended packages are weighted by factor three compared to suggested packages. Release critical bugs have a much larger weight than important, while the contribution of normal bugs is even smaller and minor bugs have a very small weight. Wishlist bugs are ignored in this calculation. The resulting sum is compared to some boundaries to find a verbal form. The actual numbers need some adjustment to make real sense - this evaluation method is in testing phase.
The severities of bugs are weighted as follows:

critical	10
grave	10
serious	10
important	5
normal	3
minor	1
wishlist	0