Summary

Bugs of task telescopecontrol

Total bugs: 7

Open bugs: 7

Fixed bugs: 0

Links to other tasks

Tasks overview

Ascl 78 (639)

Astroconda 27 (267)

Catalogs 1 (3)

Data reduction 9 (69)

Development 69 (675)

Education 21 (153)

Fedora 1305 (8661)

Frameworks 10 (63)

Gdl 4 (54)

Iraf 3 (33)

Java 4 (15)

Publication 254 (1941)

Pulsar analysis 0 (0)

Python 58 (528)

Python3 94 (801)

Radio astronomy 5 (66)

Scisoft 156 (1287)

Simulation 1 (30)

Spaceship navigation 0 (0)

Tcl/tk 19 (147)

Telescope control 7 (39)

Tools 7 (54)

Viewers 24 (147)

Virtual observatory 9 (93)

Legend

Severity	Dependent	Suggested
critical	0	0
grave	0	0
serious	0	0
important	1	0
normal	2	0
minor	2	0
wishlist	2	0

Summary bugs page of task Telescope control

Consider looking into bugs of this task^*

Open bugs in dependent packages

1 important, 2 normal, 2 minor, 2 wishlist

aravis (1) Homepage: https://wiki.gnome.org/Projects/Aravis Vcs Debian Astronomy Team
1082805	libaravis-dev: Missing libaravis-dev Build-Depends: libusb-1.0-0-dev
indi (1) Homepage: https://www.indilib.org/ Vcs Debian Krap Maintainers
1003924	indi: reproducible-builds: BuildId differences triggered by RPATH	patch
kstars (2) Homepage: https://edu.kde.org/kstars/ Vcs Debian KDE Extras Team
961437	kstars: Several icons are empty
1046187	kstars: Fails to build source after successful build	ftbfs, sid, trixie
wxastrocapture (3) Homepage: https://github.com/wxAstro/wxAstroCapture Vcs Debian Science Team
810465	wxastrocapture: please switch to libusb 1.0
1032898	wxastrocapture: FTBFS on hppa - no sa_restorer field	ftbfs, patch
1047702	wxastrocapture: Fails to build source after successful build	ftbfs, sid, trixie

Open bugs in suggested packages

Done bugs

^*To estimate the overall status of the packages in the dependencies of a metapackage a weighted severity is calculated. Done bugs are ignored and bugs in dependent and recommended packages are weighted by factor three compared to suggested packages. Release critical bugs have a much larger weight than important, while the contribution of normal bugs is even smaller and minor bugs have a very small weight. Wishlist bugs are ignored in this calculation. The resulting sum is compared to some boundaries to find a verbal form. The actual numbers need some adjustment to make real sense - this evaluation method is in testing phase.
The severities of bugs are weighted as follows:

critical	10
grave	10
serious	10
important	5
normal	3
minor	1
wishlist	0