Debian Astro Project
Summary
Bugs of task tools
Total bugs: 14
Open bugs: 12
Fixed bugs: 2
Links to other tasks
Ascl 87 (525)
Astroconda 31 (216)
Catalogs 1 (3)
Development 51 (363)
Education 21 (144)
Fedora 1246 (8544)
Frameworks 10 (24)
Gdl 6 (84)
Iraf 6 (42)
Java 4 (9)
Publication 283 (2037)
Python 0 (0)
Python3 137 (1200)
Scisoft 159 (1215)
Simulation 7 (18)
Tcl/tk 21 (135)
Tools 12 (96)
Viewers 23 (159)
Legend
SeverityDependentSuggested
critical 0 0
grave 0 0
serious 0 0
important 5 0
normal 1 0
minor 4 0
wishlist 2 0

Summary bugs page of task Tools

Immediately looking into bugs of the dependencies of this task is advised (96)*

Open bugs in dependent packages

5 important, 1 normal, 4 minor, 2 wishlist
1105266 alfa: FTBFS with make --shuffle=reverse: Fatal Error: Cannot open module file ‘mod_readfiles.mod’ for reading at (1): No such file or directory forky, ftbfs, sid, trixie
891203 astropy-utils: Please package the showtable script
1144243 python-astropy-doc empty when built with <nocheck>
838427 casacore: FTBFS on hppa and mips64el: tFFTServer2 fails
1134687 control Homepage seems not existent
1045068 funtools: Fails to build source after successful build forky, ftbfs, sid, trixie
1105483 neat: FTBFS with make --shuffle=reverse: Fatal Error: Cannot open module file ‘mod_types.mod’ for reading at (1): No such file or directory forky, ftbfs, sid, trixie
1116193 siril: color calibration fails due to lack of networking support
1147688 siril: FTBFS with OpenCV 5.0 ftbfs
1076547 iraf-wcstools: Potential vulnerability due to similarity with CVE-2021-33797 in MuJS project
1077881 wcstools-3.9.7 crlf change patch, wontfix
1119053 Updating the xpa Uploaders list

Open bugs in suggested packages

Done bugs

1137044 astropy: FTBFS in bookworm bookworm, ftbfs
1144996 astropy: FTBFS due to missing slow and hugemem definitions forky, ftbfs, patch, sid
*To estimate the overall status of the packages in the dependencies of a metapackage a weighted severity is calculated. Done bugs are ignored and bugs in dependent and recommended packages are weighted by factor three compared to suggested packages. Release critical bugs have a much larger weight than important, while the contribution of normal bugs is even smaller and minor bugs have a very small weight. Wishlist bugs are ignored in this calculation. The resulting sum is compared to some boundaries to find a verbal form. The actual numbers need some adjustment to make real sense - this evaluation method is in testing phase.
The severities of bugs are weighted as follows:
critical10
grave10
serious10
important5
normal3
minor1
wishlist0
Last update: Thu, 01 Oct 2026 04:06:54 -0000