Debian Astro Project
Summary
Bugs of task tools
Total bugs: 13
Open bugs: 12
Fixed bugs: 1
Links to other tasks
Ascl 91 (927)
Astroconda 28 (249)
Catalogs 1 (3)
Data reduction 13 (162)
Development 83 (831)
Education 22 (156)
Fedora 1295 (8793)
Frameworks 14 (144)
Gdl 7 (114)
Iraf 6 (96)
Java 4 (15)
Publication 267 (2040)
Python 0 (0)
Python3 93 (930)
Radio astronomy 6 (120)
Scisoft 143 (1185)
Simulation 5 (42)
Tcl/tk 22 (231)
Tools 12 (177)
Viewers 29 (252)
Legend
SeverityDependentSuggested
critical 0 0
grave 0 0
serious 4 0
important 2 0
normal 2 0
minor 3 0
wishlist 1 0

Summary bugs page of task Tools

Immediately looking into bugs of the dependencies of this task is advised (177)*

Open bugs in dependent packages

4 serious, 2 important, 2 normal, 3 minor, 1 wishlist
1105266 alfa: FTBFS with make --shuffle=reverse: Fatal Error: Cannot open module file ‘mod_readfiles.mod’ for reading at (1): No such file or directory forky, ftbfs, sid, trixie
891203 astropy-utils: Please package the showtable script
1095064 python3-astropy: should not depend on python3-pytest*
838427 casacore: FTBFS on hppa and mips64el: tFFTServer2 fails
1096412 casacore: ftbfs with GCC-15 forky, ftbfs, sid
1045068 funtools: Fails to build source after successful build forky, ftbfs, sid, trixie
1096664 funtools: ftbfs with GCC-15 forky, ftbfs, sid
1105483 neat: FTBFS with make --shuffle=reverse: Fatal Error: Cannot open module file ‘mod_types.mod’ for reading at (1): No such file or directory forky, ftbfs, sid, trixie
1114381 siril: FTBFS: /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/15/include/omp.h:459:1: error: template with C linkage forky, ftbfs, sid
1076547 iraf-wcstools: Potential vulnerability due to similarity with CVE-2021-33797 in MuJS project
1077881 wcstools-3.9.7 crlf change patch, wontfix
1098084 wcstools: ftbfs with GCC-15 forky, ftbfs, sid

Open bugs in suggested packages

Done bugs

1096335 astronomical-almanac: ftbfs with GCC-15 forky, ftbfs, sid
*To estimate the overall status of the packages in the dependencies of a metapackage a weighted severity is calculated. Done bugs are ignored and bugs in dependent and recommended packages are weighted by factor three compared to suggested packages. Release critical bugs have a much larger weight than important, while the contribution of normal bugs is even smaller and minor bugs have a very small weight. Wishlist bugs are ignored in this calculation. The resulting sum is compared to some boundaries to find a verbal form. The actual numbers need some adjustment to make real sense - this evaluation method is in testing phase.
The severities of bugs are weighted as follows:
critical10
grave10
serious10
important5
normal3
minor1
wishlist0
Last update: Thu, 11 Sep 2025 02:27:17 -0000