Debian Astro Project
Summary
Bugs of task tools
Total bugs: 13
Open bugs: 12
Fixed bugs: 1
Links to other tasks
Ascl 83 (645)
Astroconda 29 (249)
Catalogs 1 (3)
Data reduction 13 (117)
Development 69 (561)
Education 22 (156)
Fedora 1296 (8661)
Frameworks 16 (105)
Gdl 5 (84)
Iraf 12 (156)
Java 3 (6)
Publication 271 (2043)
Python 47 (411)
Python3 86 (729)
Scisoft 149 (1179)
Simulation 5 (42)
Tcl/tk 23 (195)
Tools 12 (117)
Viewers 28 (207)
Legend
SeverityDependentSuggested
critical 0 0
grave 0 0
serious 0 0
important 6 0
normal 2 0
minor 3 0
wishlist 1 0

Summary bugs page of task Tools

Immediately looking into bugs of the dependencies of this task is advised (117)*

Open bugs in dependent packages

6 important, 2 normal, 3 minor, 1 wishlist
1105266 alfa: FTBFS with make --shuffle=reverse: Fatal Error: Cannot open module file ‘mod_readfiles.mod’ for reading at (1): No such file or directory ftbfs, sid, trixie
1096335 astronomical-almanac: ftbfs with GCC-15 forky, sid
891203 astropy-utils: Please package the showtable script
1095064 python3-astropy: should not depend on python3-pytest*
838427 casacore: FTBFS on hppa and mips64el: tFFTServer2 fails
1096412 casacore: ftbfs with GCC-15 forky, sid
1045068 funtools: Fails to build source after successful build ftbfs, sid, trixie
1096664 funtools: ftbfs with GCC-15 forky, sid
1105483 neat: FTBFS with make --shuffle=reverse: Fatal Error: Cannot open module file ‘mod_types.mod’ for reading at (1): No such file or directory ftbfs, sid, trixie
1076547 iraf-wcstools: Potential vulnerability due to similarity with CVE-2021-33797 in MuJS project
1077881 wcstools-3.9.7 crlf change patch, wontfix
1098084 wcstools: ftbfs with GCC-15 forky, sid

Open bugs in suggested packages

Done bugs

1078611 astropy: will FTBFS during trixie support period ftbfs
*To estimate the overall status of the packages in the dependencies of a metapackage a weighted severity is calculated. Done bugs are ignored and bugs in dependent and recommended packages are weighted by factor three compared to suggested packages. Release critical bugs have a much larger weight than important, while the contribution of normal bugs is even smaller and minor bugs have a very small weight. Wishlist bugs are ignored in this calculation. The resulting sum is compared to some boundaries to find a verbal form. The actual numbers need some adjustment to make real sense - this evaluation method is in testing phase.
The severities of bugs are weighted as follows:
critical10
grave10
serious10
important5
normal3
minor1
wishlist0
Last update: Mon, 19 May 2025 04:20:42 -0000