Summary

Bugs of task radioastronomy

Total bugs: 7

Open bugs: 4

Fixed bugs: 3

Links to other tasks

Tasks overview

Ascl 89 (642)

Astroconda 26 (165)

Catalogs 1 (3)

Data reduction 9 (75)

Development 77 (678)

Education 22 (156)

Fedora 1302 (8733)

Frameworks 12 (84)

Gdl 4 (39)

Iraf 4 (36)

Java 5 (18)

Publication 283 (2052)

Pulsar analysis 0 (0)

Python 0 (0)

Python3 121 (1281)

Radio astronomy 4 (90)

Scisoft 163 (1224)

Simulation 5 (15)

Spaceship navigation 1 (15)

Tcl/tk 21 (147)

Telescope control 12 (129)

Tools 10 (96)

Viewers 32 (255)

Virtual observatory 5 (30)

Legend

Severity	Dependent	Suggested
critical	0	0
grave	0	0
serious	2	0
important	2	0
normal	0	0
minor	0	0
wishlist	0	0

Summary bugs page of task Radio astronomy

Immediately looking into bugs of the dependencies of this task is advised (90)^*

Open bugs in dependent packages

2 serious, 2 important

casacore (1) Homepage: https://casacore.github.io/casacore Vcs Debian Astro Team
838427	casacore: FTBFS on hppa and mips64el: tFFTServer2 fails
pybdsf (2) Homepage: https://pybdsf.readthedocs.io/ Vcs Debian Astro Maintainers
1110653	pybdsf ftbfs with boost 1.88	forky, sid
1122049	pybdsf: FTBFS with Python 3.14: Segmentation fault	ftbfs
python-casacore (1) Homepage: https://github.com/casacore/python-casacore Vcs Debian Astro Team
1122028	python-casacore: FTBFS with Python 3.14	forky, ftbfs, patch, sid

Open bugs in suggested packages

Done bugs

aoflagger (1) Homepage: https://aoflagger.readthedocs.io Vcs Debian Astro Team
1115249	aoflagger: FTBFS with glibc 2.42 due to conflict with the newly added pown function	fixed-upstream, forky, ftbfs, patch, sid
openvlbi (1) Homepage: https://iliaplatone.github.io/OpenVLBI/ Vcs Debian Astronomy Team
1113367	openvlbi: FTBFS with CMake 4	forky, ftbfs, sid
spectral-cube (1) Homepage: https://spectral-cube.readthedocs.org Vcs Debian Astronomy Team
1123872	spectral-cube: autopkgtest regression with joblib 1.5.2-1

^*To estimate the overall status of the packages in the dependencies of a metapackage a weighted severity is calculated. Done bugs are ignored and bugs in dependent and recommended packages are weighted by factor three compared to suggested packages. Release critical bugs have a much larger weight than important, while the contribution of normal bugs is even smaller and minor bugs have a very small weight. Wishlist bugs are ignored in this calculation. The resulting sum is compared to some boundaries to find a verbal form. The actual numbers need some adjustment to make real sense - this evaluation method is in testing phase.
The severities of bugs are weighted as follows:

critical	10
grave	10
serious	10
important	5
normal	3
minor	1
wishlist	0