Summary

Bugs of task radioastronomy

Total bugs: 7

Open bugs: 4

Fixed bugs: 3

Links to other tasks

Tasks overview

Ascl 92 (675)

Astroconda 31 (216)

Catalogs 1 (3)

Data reduction 8 (42)

Development 62 (501)

Education 22 (144)

Fedora 1261 (8874)

Frameworks 9 (24)

Gdl 5 (54)

Iraf 6 (42)

Java 4 (9)

Publication 285 (2076)

Pulsar analysis 0 (0)

Python 0 (0)

Python3 140 (1278)

Radio astronomy 4 (90)

Scisoft 160 (1245)

Simulation 7 (18)

Spaceship navigation 0 (0)

Tcl/tk 21 (135)

Telescope control 10 (90)

Tools 11 (81)

Viewers 23 (159)

Virtual observatory 5 (51)

Legend

Severity	Dependent	Suggested
critical	0	0
grave	0	0
serious	2	0
important	2	0
normal	0	0
minor	0	0
wishlist	0	0

Summary bugs page of task Radio astronomy

Immediately looking into bugs of the dependencies of this task is advised (90)^*

Open bugs in dependent packages

2 serious, 2 important

casacore (1) Homepage: https://casacore.github.io/casacore Vcs Debian Astro Team
838427	casacore: FTBFS on hppa and mips64el: tFFTServer2 fails
openvlbi (1) Homepage: https://iliaplatone.github.io/OpenVLBI/ Vcs Debian Astronomy Team
1125650	openvlbi: FTBFS: collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status	forky, ftbfs, sid
purify (1) Homepage: https://astro-informatics.github.io/purify/ Vcs Debian Astro Team
1136319	purify: FTBFS with libeigen3-dev 5.0 (major version transition)	forky, ftbfs, sid
pybdsf (1) Homepage: https://pybdsf.readthedocs.io/ Vcs Debian Astro Maintainers
1110653	pybdsf ftbfs with boost 1.88	forky, sid

Open bugs in suggested packages

Done bugs

openvlbi (1) Homepage: https://iliaplatone.github.io/OpenVLBI/ Vcs Debian Astronomy Team
1113367	openvlbi: FTBFS with CMake 4	forky, ftbfs, sid
pybdsf (1) Homepage: https://pybdsf.readthedocs.io/ Vcs Debian Astro Maintainers
1144409	pybdsf: please make the build reproducible	patch
wsclean (1) Homepage: https://gitlab.com/aroffringa/wsclean/ Vcs Debian Astro Team
1133667	wsclean: ftbfs with GCC-16	forky, ftbfs, patch, sid

^*To estimate the overall status of the packages in the dependencies of a metapackage a weighted severity is calculated. Done bugs are ignored and bugs in dependent and recommended packages are weighted by factor three compared to suggested packages. Release critical bugs have a much larger weight than important, while the contribution of normal bugs is even smaller and minor bugs have a very small weight. Wishlist bugs are ignored in this calculation. The resulting sum is compared to some boundaries to find a verbal form. The actual numbers need some adjustment to make real sense - this evaluation method is in testing phase.
The severities of bugs are weighted as follows:

critical	10
grave	10
serious	10
important	5
normal	3
minor	1
wishlist	0