Debian Med Project
Help us to see Debian used by medical practitioners and biomedical researchers! Join us on the Salsa page.
Summary
Bugs of task bio-ngs
Total bugs: 9
Open bugs: 7
Fixed bugs: 2
Links to other tasks
Biology 227 (1778)
Phylogeny 11 (90)
Cloud 43 (450)
Covid-19 148 (1344)
Medical data 1 (1)
Dental 1 (3)
Epidemiology 9 (125)
Imaging 207 (933)
Laboratory 1 (9)
Oncology 1 (3)
Pharmacology 1 (9)
Physics 24 (159)
Practice 6 (33)
Psychology 6 (46)
Research 0 (0)
Statistics 3 (7)
Tools 38 (241)
Typesetting 63 (508)
Legend
SeverityDependentSuggested
critical 0 0
grave 0 0
serious 1 1
important 2 0
normal 2 0
minor 1 0
wishlist 0 0

Summary bugs page of task Next generation sequencing

Immediately looking into bugs of the dependencies of this task is advised (91)*

Open bugs in dependent packages

1 serious, 2 important, 2 normal, 1 minor
870060 bcftools FTBFS on big endian: 107 tests failed ftbfs, upstream
1067374 blasr: FTBFS: ./obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/../extrautils/StoreQualityByContextFromCmpH5.cpp:40: multiple definition of `main'; toAfg.p/utils_ToAfg.cpp.o:./obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/../utils/ToAfg.cpp:30: first defined here ftbfs, sid, trixie
1048396 last-align: Fails to build source after successful build ftbfs, sid, trixie
1040391 sra-toolkit: broken symlink: /usr/lib/debian-med/bin/kget -> ../../../bin/vdb-get
1053411 sra-sdk: FTBFS with re2 >= 20230601 (which requires abseil) upstream
1065961 sra-sdk: Please drop dependencies on python3-distutils ftbfs

Open bugs in suggested packages

1 serious
1044072 python-anndata: FTBFS with pandas 2.0 trixie, sid

Done bugs

1066534 daligner: FTBFS: ONElib.c:1792:29: error: implicit declaration of function ‘vasprintf’; did you mean ‘vsprintf’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] ftbfs, sid, trixie
1062344 htslib: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition patch
*To estimate the overall status of the packages in the dependencies of a metapackage a weighted severity is calculated. Done bugs are ignored and bugs in dependent and recommended packages are weighted by factor three compared to suggested packages. Release critical bugs have a much larger weight than important, while the contribution of normal bugs is even smaller and minor bugs have a very small weight. Wishlist bugs are ignored in this calculation. The resulting sum is compared to some boundaries to find a verbal form. The actual numbers need some adjustment to make real sense - this evaluation method is in testing phase.
The severities of bugs are weighted as follows:
critical10
grave10
serious10
important5
normal3
minor1
wishlist0
Last update: Thu, 28 Mar 2024 04:46:13 -0000