Debian Med Project
Help us to see Debian used by medical practitioners and biomedical researchers! Join us on the Salsa page.
Summary
Bugs of task bio-phylogeny
Total bugs: 16
Open bugs: 15
Fixed bugs: 1
Links to other tasks
Biology 323 (1741)
Phylogeny 15 (90)
Cloud 52 (288)
Covid-19 170 (1307)
Medical data 1 (1)
Dental 1 (3)
Epidemiology 3 (60)
Imaging 232 (1088)
Laboratory 1 (9)
Oncology 1 (3)
Pharmacology 1 (9)
Physics 28 (195)
Practice 7 (42)
Psychology 7 (39)
Research 0 (0)
Statistics 2 (4)
Tools 38 (241)
Typesetting 68 (556)
Legend
SeverityDependentSuggested
critical 0 0
grave 0 0
serious 2 0
important 0 0
normal 0 0
minor 10 0
wishlist 3 0

Summary bugs page of task Phylogeny

Immediately looking into bugs of the dependencies of this task is advised (90)*

Open bugs in dependent packages

2 serious, 10 minor, 3 wishlist
1025424 beast-mcmc: please enable autopkgtest help
1043640 beast-mcmc: Fails to build source after successful build ftbfs, sid, trixie
1041451 gmap: FTBFS on all !amd64 archs ftbfs, upstream
1045400 mrbayes: Fails to build source after successful build ftbfs, sid, trixie
1049739 mrbayes: Fails to build binary packages again after successful build ftbfs, sid, trixie
1048044 muscle3: Fails to build source after successful build ftbfs, sid, trixie
1009156 pplacer: Add autopkgtest
1024889 pplacer: build-depends on dropped package
1046067 proalign: Fails to build source after successful build ftbfs, sid, trixie
1048254 proda: Fails to build source after successful build ftbfs, sid, trixie
1048270 quicktree: Fails to build source after successful build ftbfs, sid, trixie
956848 t-coffee: should use "example" blastpgp.pl
1049170 tree-puzzle: Fails to build source after successful build ftbfs, sid, trixie
1046737 treeview: Fails to build source after successful build ftbfs, sid, trixie
846481 src:treeviewx: Please remove statically linked code copy of libncl

Open bugs in suggested packages

Done bugs

1045094 src:gmap: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on !amd64 sid, trixie
*To estimate the overall status of the packages in the dependencies of a metapackage a weighted severity is calculated. Done bugs are ignored and bugs in dependent and recommended packages are weighted by factor three compared to suggested packages. Release critical bugs have a much larger weight than important, while the contribution of normal bugs is even smaller and minor bugs have a very small weight. Wishlist bugs are ignored in this calculation. The resulting sum is compared to some boundaries to find a verbal form. The actual numbers need some adjustment to make real sense - this evaluation method is in testing phase.
The severities of bugs are weighted as follows:
critical10
grave10
serious10
important5
normal3
minor1
wishlist0
Last update: Sun, 01 Oct 2023 16:36:47 -0000