Debian Med Project
Help us to see Debian used by medical practitioners and biomedical researchers! Join us on the Salsa page.
Bugs of task epi
Total bugs: 15
Open bugs: 13
Fixed bugs: 2
Links to other tasks
Biology 265 (2349)
Biology development 129 (1084)
Phylogeny 10 (72)
Cloud 53 (642)
Covid-19 154 (1587)
Medical data 1 (1)
Dental 1 (3)
Epidemiology 13 (224)
Imaging 210 (1063)
Laboratory 1 (9)
Oncology 1 (3)
Pharmacology 1 (9)
Physics 28 (213)
Practice 6 (33)
Psychology 6 (46)
Research 0 (0)
Statistics 3 (7)
Tools 38 (243)
Typesetting 66 (529)
critical 0 0
grave 2 0
serious 3 0
important 4 1
normal 1 0
minor 0 0
wishlist 2 0

Summary bugs page of task Epidemiology

Immediately looking into bugs of the dependencies of this task is advised (224)*

Open bugs in dependent packages

2 grave, 3 serious, 4 important, 1 normal, 2 wishlist
995966 epigrass: epirunner and epidash fail to run due to missing dash modules pending
998265 epigrass: autopkgtest regression: The 'panel' distribution was not found
1057989 epigrass: runtime dependency on cython sid, trixie
1058470 epigrass: please (temporarily) drop python3-numba dependencies
983517 pytorch: Build documentation
1056388 FTBFS with fmtlib 10 fixed-upstream, ftbfs
1057644 pytorch: build for all supported Python versions wontfix
1070379 pytorch: CVE-2024-31580 CVE-2024-31583 CVE-2024-31584 security, upstream
1071655 pytorch: FTBFS on ppc64el ftbfs
1072969 pytorch: CVE-2024-5480 security, upstream
1076183 pytorch: please rebuild against flatbuffers
1071106 r-cran-sf: autopkgtest regression in testing

Open bugs in suggested packages

1 important
1058481 python-epimodels: please (temporarily) drop python3-numba dependencies

Done bugs

994423 pytorch: Baseline violation on armhf trixie, ftbfs, experimental, bullseye, sid, bookworm
1060097 pytorch: FBFS: /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/aten/src/ATen/native/quantized/cpu/qlinear_prepack.cpp:249:103: error: cannot convert ‘dnnl::memory::data_type’ to ‘const ideep::dims&’ {aka ‘const std::vector<long int>&’} ftbfs
*To estimate the overall status of the packages in the dependencies of a metapackage a weighted severity is calculated. Done bugs are ignored and bugs in dependent and recommended packages are weighted by factor three compared to suggested packages. Release critical bugs have a much larger weight than important, while the contribution of normal bugs is even smaller and minor bugs have a very small weight. Wishlist bugs are ignored in this calculation. The resulting sum is compared to some boundaries to find a verbal form. The actual numbers need some adjustment to make real sense - this evaluation method is in testing phase.
The severities of bugs are weighted as follows:
Last update: Tue, 16 Jul 2024 04:37:40 -0000