Debian Med Project
Help us to see Debian used by medical practitioners and biomedical researchers! Join us on the Salsa page.
Summary
Bugs of task practice
Total bugs: 7
Open bugs: 6
Fixed bugs: 1
Links to other tasks
Tasks overview
Biology 233 (1977)
Biology development 134 (1482)
Phylogeny 11 (108)
Cloud 36 (348)
Covid-19 204 (2239)
Medical data 0 (0)
Dental 3 (21)
Epidemiology 29 (393)
Imaging 221 (996)
Laboratory 1 (30)
Oncology 0 (0)
Pharmacology 1 (15)
Physics 27 (240)
Practice 6 (45)
Psychology 17 (154)
Research 0 (0)
Statistics 8 (12)
Tools 36 (240)
Typesetting 72 (626)
Legend
SeverityDependentSuggested
critical 0 0
grave 0 0
serious 0 0
important 0 0
normal 5 0
minor 0 0
wishlist 1 0

Summary bugs page of task Practice

Consider looking into bugs of this task*

Open bugs in dependent packages

5 normal, 1 wishlist
entangle (2) Homepage: https://entangle-photo.org/ Vcs Debian PhotoTools Maintainers
1118518 gir1.2-entangle-0.1: installs typelib in legacy /usr/lib/girepository-1.0 directory
1118608 entangle: Seems confused about whether its API is public or private
libchipcard (2) Homepage: https://www.aquamaniac.de/rdm/projects/libchipcard Vcs Micha Lenk
1006686 libchipcard-dev: undefined variable in libchipcard-client.pc fixed-upstream, patch, upstream
1006687 libchipcard6: card.c leaks memory patch, upstream
orthanc (1) Homepage: https://www.orthanc-server.com/ Vcs Debian Med Packaging Team
1001387 Wishlist: Package Stone of Orthanc Webviewer
qrisk2 (1) Homepage: https://qrisk.org/ Vcs Debian Med Packaging Team
912119 qrisk2: please provide qrisk3

Open bugs in suggested packages

Done bugs

orthanc-wsi (1) Homepage: https://orthanc.uclouvain.be/book/plugins/wsi.html Vcs Debian Med Packaging Team
1121713 orthanc-wsi: FTBFS: /build/reproducible-path/orthanc-wsi-3.3+dfsg/Framework/Outputs/MultiframeDicomWriter.cpp:341:31: error: no matching function for call to ‘Orthanc::DcmtkTranscoder::Transcode(Orthanc::IDicomTranscoder::DicomImage&, Orthanc::IDicomTranscoder::DicomImage&, std::set<Orthanc::DicomTransferSyntax>&, bool)’ ftbfs
*To estimate the overall status of the packages in the dependencies of a metapackage a weighted severity is calculated. Done bugs are ignored and bugs in dependent and recommended packages are weighted by factor three compared to suggested packages. Release critical bugs have a much larger weight than important, while the contribution of normal bugs is even smaller and minor bugs have a very small weight. Wishlist bugs are ignored in this calculation. The resulting sum is compared to some boundaries to find a verbal form. The actual numbers need some adjustment to make real sense - this evaluation method is in testing phase.
The severities of bugs are weighted as follows:
critical10
grave10
serious10
important5
normal3
minor1
wishlist0
Last update: Fri, 19 Dec 2025 16:19:14 -0000