Debian Science Project
Summary
Bugs of task biology
Total bugs: 13
Open bugs: 13
Fixed bugs: 0
Links to other tasks
Biology 13 (150)
Chemistry 78 (675)
Data acquisition 62 (298)
Data management 63 (505)
Devices 17 (126)
Economics 33 (184)
Engineering 96 (892)
Engineering-dev 74 (759)
Geography 95 (674)
Geometry 5 (22)
Linguistics 84 (314)
Logic 36 (183)
Machine learning 48 (394)
Mathematics 258 (1888)
Mathematics-dev 209 (1679)
Meteorology 106 (645)
Meteorology-dev 199 (882)
Nanoscale physics 317 (2278)
Physics 93 (897)
Physics-dev 36 (380)
Presentation 81 (645)
Psychophysics 6 (67)
Robotics 108 (432)
Robotics-dev 28 (225)
Simulations 49 (424)
Social 0 (0)
Statistics 53 (330)
Tools 13 (70)
Typesetting 279 (1944)
Viewing 306 (1857)
Viewing-dev 60 (511)
Workflow 34 (226)
Legend
SeverityDependentSuggested
critical 0 0
grave 2 0
serious 1 0
important 0 1
normal 5 0
minor 3 1
wishlist 0 0

Summary bugs page of task Biology

Immediately looking into bugs of the dependencies of this task is advised (150)*

Open bugs in dependent packages

2 grave, 1 serious, 5 normal, 3 minor
756997 Segfaults on start
757008 Segfaults on start
838137 critterding: FTBFS in experimental: be_command_system.cpp:13:94: error: '_1' was not declared in this scope ftbfs
856739 Updating the critterding Uploaders list
929586 critterding FTCBFS: does not pass --host to ./configure patch
998789 critterding: bashism in configure script ftbfs
1009908 critterding build depends on qt4 ftbfs
1038177 critterding: Depends on SDL 1.2 sid, trixie
1044933 critterding: Fails to build source after successful build ftbfs, sid, trixie
1034327 nmodl: reproducible-builds: Embedded build path in /usr/bin/nmodl patch
1047577 nmodl: Fails to build source after successful build ftbfs, sid, trixie

Open bugs in suggested packages

1 important, 1 minor
1020544 siconos: FTBFS on s390x: Cholesky solve kNM_test failed ftbfs
1046177 siconos: Fails to build source after successful build ftbfs, sid, trixie

Done bugs

*To estimate the overall status of the packages in the dependencies of a metapackage a weighted severity is calculated. Done bugs are ignored and bugs in dependent and recommended packages are weighted by factor three compared to suggested packages. Release critical bugs have a much larger weight than important, while the contribution of normal bugs is even smaller and minor bugs have a very small weight. Wishlist bugs are ignored in this calculation. The resulting sum is compared to some boundaries to find a verbal form. The actual numbers need some adjustment to make real sense - this evaluation method is in testing phase.
The severities of bugs are weighted as follows:
critical10
grave10
serious10
important5
normal3
minor1
wishlist0
Last update: Sun, 01 Oct 2023 04:12:46 -0000