Debian Science Project
Summary
Bugs of task biology
Total bugs: 12
Open bugs: 12
Fixed bugs: 0
Links to other tasks
Biology 12 (148)
Chemistry 83 (796)
Data acquisition 63 (382)
Data management 62 (518)
Devices 15 (114)
Economics 31 (154)
Engineering 87 (821)
Engineering-dev 73 (594)
Geography 93 (683)
Geometry 8 (41)
Linguistics 91 (401)
Logic 37 (213)
Machine learning 45 (409)
Mathematics 256 (2145)
Mathematics-dev 196 (1729)
Meteorology 99 (614)
Meteorology-dev 202 (814)
Nanoscale physics 329 (2623)
Physics 81 (782)
Physics-dev 33 (263)
Presentation 75 (606)
Psychophysics 6 (61)
Robotics 111 (427)
Robotics-dev 28 (201)
Simulations 40 (385)
Social 0 (0)
Statistics 54 (324)
Tools 15 (128)
Typesetting 261 (1716)
Viewing 314 (1963)
Viewing-dev 74 (716)
Workflow 38 (276)
Legend
SeverityDependentSuggested
critical 0 0
grave 2 0
serious 1 1
important 0 1
normal 4 0
minor 2 1
wishlist 0 0

Summary bugs page of task Biology

Immediately looking into bugs of the dependencies of this task is advised (148)*

Open bugs in dependent packages

2 grave, 1 serious, 4 normal, 2 minor
756997 Segfaults on start
757008 Segfaults on start
838137 critterding: FTBFS in experimental: be_command_system.cpp:13:94: error: '_1' was not declared in this scope ftbfs
856739 Updating the critterding Uploaders list
929586 critterding FTCBFS: does not pass --host to ./configure patch
998789 critterding: bashism in configure script ftbfs
1009908 critterding build depends on qt4 ftbfs
1038177 critterding: Depends on SDL 1.2 sid, trixie
1044933 critterding: Fails to build source after successful build ftbfs, sid, trixie

Open bugs in suggested packages

1 serious, 1 important, 1 minor
1020544 siconos: FTBFS on s390x: Cholesky solve kNM_test failed ftbfs
1046177 siconos: Fails to build source after successful build ftbfs, sid, trixie
1066316 siconos: FTBFS: lcp_nsqp.c:139:3: error: implicit declaration of function ‘numerics_error’; did you mean ‘numerics_EXPORTS’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] ftbfs, sid, trixie

Done bugs

*To estimate the overall status of the packages in the dependencies of a metapackage a weighted severity is calculated. Done bugs are ignored and bugs in dependent and recommended packages are weighted by factor three compared to suggested packages. Release critical bugs have a much larger weight than important, while the contribution of normal bugs is even smaller and minor bugs have a very small weight. Wishlist bugs are ignored in this calculation. The resulting sum is compared to some boundaries to find a verbal form. The actual numbers need some adjustment to make real sense - this evaluation method is in testing phase.
The severities of bugs are weighted as follows:
critical10
grave10
serious10
important5
normal3
minor1
wishlist0
Last update: Tue, 23 Apr 2024 16:22:15 -0000